There is an ongoing debate surrounding the accountability of parents for their children's misbehavior. While it is understandable why some individuals attribute responsibility to parents, I firmly contend that teenage lawbreakers should bear full responsibility for their actions. Proponents of parental accountability argue that parents are the primary influencers in their children's lives, serving as role models who significantly shape their development. They assert that criminal behaviors among teenagers can be traced back to the environment in which they are raised. For instance, children exposed to domestic violence or family breakdowns are more likely to become aggressive adults who commit violent crimes. However, while parents do play a crucial role, it is important to recognize that juvenile delinquency stems from a multitude of factors beyond parental influence. The festering issue of juvenile crimes can be attributed to various factors, including environmental influences and the immature state of teenagers' brains. Environmental factors, such as education and social conditions, can mold, weaken, or reinforce an individual's characteristics. Therefore, it is plausible for a child to exhibit different behaviors from their parents due to these external influences. Furthermore, the immaturity of teenagers' brains can impact their ability to control emotions and make sound decisions, rendering them more susceptible to social triggers. Consequently, holding teenage lawbreakers accountable for their actions becomes imperative in instilling a sense of awareness and responsibility, thereby reducing the likelihood of relapse into criminal behavior. In conclusion, while parents undeniably play a significant role in shaping their children's behavior, attributing complete responsibility to them overlooks the complexity of juvenile delinquency. By recognizing the multifaceted nature of the issue and emphasizing the accountability of teenage lawbreakers, we can better address the problem.