Opinions diverge regarding the significant national investments required for organizing international sports events like the Olympic Games and the resulting impacts on countries. In my view, I align with the perspective that emphasizes the substantial financial commitments involved. On one hand, proponents argue that hosting such competitions can yield notable benefits, primarily through tourism and economic stimulation. Countries hosting sports events often witness a surge in visitors, particularly sports enthusiasts from across the globe who seek to immerse themselves in the excitement of live matches. This influx leads to increased spending on goods and services such as transportation and lodging, thereby bolstering the local economy and tourism sector. Moreover, hosting major sports events offers a platform for host nations to showcase their infrastructure and organizational prowess on a global scale, enhancing their international reputation and potentially attracting foreign investment. Conversely, I contend that hosting these events places a strain on national budgets. Considerable government funds are channeled into infrastructure projects such as stadium construction and sports facilities to ensure the success of these prestigious events, often without yielding the anticipated economic returns. Consequently, financial resources that could be allocated to pressing issues like healthcare and education, which are fundamental needs of the population, are diverted. Furthermore, hosting large-scale sports events inevitably invites social challenges, including increased incidences of theft and robbery, particularly in crowded areas. Opportunistic criminals, both local and foreign, exploit the presence of large crowds, leading to social disorder and placing additional burdens on the host country's security apparatus. In conclusion, while hosting sports events undoubtedly offers potential benefits such as economic stimulation and reputation enhancement, I contend that the associated social challenges and diversion of national finances warrant reconsideration. Redirecting resources towards addressing fundamental societal needs rather than pursuing temporary gains from such events may be a more prudent course of action. (305 words)